Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Chairman Polky 
 Hockeyroos’ legs too strong for Korea 

Hockeyroos’ legs too strong for Korea

After a blistering first half, Korea seemed destined to break their Olympic hoodoo against the Hockeyroos last night and finally beat their nemesis in Games competition.

Leading 4-1, it all seemed plain sailing for the Koreans as they reached for the oranges.

But it was Shelly Liddelow, who was only selected when Fiona Johnson did a hammie, who was the Cinderella of the story.

Two Liddelow goals later and the Aussies had stolen the match 5-4, breaking the Korean hearts in the process.

Hockey is one of my favourite sports in the Olympics, making the first week’s relentless coverage of Forbidden Topic No.4 somewhat bearable.

The fact the Hockeyroos have sensational legs is the icing on the cake.

It seems it wasn’t just the Korean goalkeeper that was in the firing line yesterday, but Channel Seven as well.

A mate of mine says you can judge an Olympics by how soon the media starts talking about the coverage. Well, that time is now.

Seven’s decision to show the Crows flog Richmond earned the ire of some, with one person even going as far as saying they’d rather watch diving, gymnastics and equestrian.

That’s just taking it too far and is borderline un-Australian!

It seems these Olympics are indelibly linked with the AFL, what with the Hawks doing Australia proud in Beijing yesterday and now it “ruining” the coverage.

And could the attack on ABC lawn bowls commentator Steve Robilliard also be linked?

"I just walked to the shop and I walked past a group of youths and one of them, I guess he was drunk, he had his shirt off and was urinating on a wall," he said.

Chinese yobbo or AFL footballer? I’ll let you decide…

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Yes, you'd have thought the Olympics would have been the perfect reason not to show Richmond on the telly, but they let it slip. The eight (there's that number again) consecutive commercials a mere 9 minutes into the AUS v ARG football was also a broadcasting masterstroke. The other networks haven't got a chance to win the hosting rights. They just can't compete against such mind-bendingly arrogant disregard for the viewership. Clearly the only reason Ch7 broadcast the Games is to prevent all their ex-Olympian hosts getting disenchanted by the lifestyle/dance/ice-skating/talent format.
Posted by fatalberton, 11/08/2008 8:51:01 AM
Comrade, the Olympic coverage is more lively than Bruce "Special" McAvaney. As a Reds fan I would have thought you would have commented on the Olyroos effort against the Argentinians in the rain...their only hope was for lightning to stop the game but the government of China wasted all those rockets to stop the rain at the ceremony. Didn't they know these games go on for more than two weeks!
Posted by Mr Capitalist, 11/08/2008 9:13:35 AM
Did anyone catch the umpire/referee or whatever they are called who did the womans hockey* game? Seriously, she must think "the world's most unsmiling person" is an Olympic event.
Posted by Broat Grodan, 11/08/2008 9:41:23 AM
Mr Capitalist, I guess that just shows the ideological differences between us. You'd rather watch Aussie men's legs get smashed by the Argies, while I'd rather watch Aussie female legs running rampant...
Posted by Chairman Polky, 11/08/2008 11:23:00 AM
Chairman Polky
Chairman Polky helps spread Beijing's Olympic propaganda.
The eunuch should not take pride in his chastity.
The eunuch should not take pride in his chastity.

Most popular articles


Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...