Opinion 
 Blogs 
 The Rant 
 A whale sized problem 

A whale sized problem

THE end justifies the means.

It's a mantra rogues and fanatics have lived by throughout history.

It is an attitude that has allowed totalitarian regimes,

dictators and other monsters to justify all manner of crimes.

And it is an attitude adopted by organisations like Sea

Shepherd in more modern times.

These self-appointed guardians, who were elected

by nobody and are beholden to no one, put the safety of themselves and others at risk by behaving in a manner that is possibly illegal, and definitely dangerous.

Don't worry, though, they are doing it for your, my and

everyone else's benefit, even though they never actually

asked us.

The truth is, the end can never justify the means. Ever.

Because, the moment someone rejects the difference between right and wrong behaviour, they invalidate any claim of moral superiority. And they've opened the door to using any immoral tactic because ''the end justifies the means''. Rant over.

Well, not quite.

Sometimes, occasionally, despite their arrogance,

recklessness and myopic morality, fanatics actually do

some good - often by accident but sometimes intentionally.

Which brings us to the Southern Ocean and whaling.

The Japanese crews on board boats like the Shonan

Maru 2 are quite literally only going about their business

and doing their jobs. And who wouldn't get a bit antsy if

some self-righteous hippy were to put themselves, and

possibly you and your work colleagues, at risk in a hostile environment because they believe their morality is superior to yours?

Does that make changing course and ramming some

sinister black stealth ship, that looks like a prop from an '80s James Bond film, justified? Of course not.

Does it make it understandable, though? You bet.

At least part of this argument about whaling is

about cultural arrogance.

Australian values - including my own - hold that eating

whales is immoral, but eating other animals isn't.

There is justification for this view. Whales are demonstrably more intelligent than cattle or tuna, and a good deal rarer too.

But we can't assume that every other culture should

conform to our values. If the Japanese want to hunt whales in their own waters for ''scientific purposes'' (read: lunch), then telling them they can't seems a tad bigotted.

However, the rash actions of Sea Shepherd have highlighted this whaling is not occuring in Japanese waters.

It is occuring in Australian territorial waters.

And we have every right, as a sovereign nation, to tell the Japanese whalers to bugger off if they break our laws (or international ones).

Sea Shepherd has highlighted how feeble Australia is at policing its own borders.

It shouldn't be up to an unelected bunch of do-goods

to shadow whalers violating Australian waters. It should be the Australian Government and the Royal Australian

Navy.

All this doesn't justify Sea Shepherd's tactics. But the end may yet be to the benefit of Australia and whale-kind alike.This time anyway. You know I'm right about

this.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Good article Gav. Is the Australian Navy supposed to save the Sea Shepherd crew if there is a catasprophe at sea?
Posted by SPN, 19/01/2010 9:30:10 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Very disappointing article: no analysis, empty, biased.
Posted by Lily, 19/01/2010 10:26:52 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Some interesting points: The Japanese are brutal, lying savages commiting crimes on the high seas - They dump tons of whale offal and refuel illegally - They force feed mecury ridden dolphin and whale meat to their own children -They are great at propaganda, up there with Hitler if you ask me - a WW2 style effort is required because diplomacy won't stop a damn thing - They have huge stockpiles of unwanted meat in the deep freeze that they can't give away - Security ships now with weapons? Come on. What's next? Gun fire (oh wait we had that didn't we?) - The financial cost of this 'research' must be enormous. How can they afford it with so many domestic issues? 9000 whales killed over 22 years for research with nothing to show for it? Gosh.
Posted by lee, 19/01/2010 11:14:28 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
The collision did not occur in Australian territorial waters, or the authorities would not be so hesitant to act over it. Australia has claimed in the past that the water is theirs, but most countries don't recognize it anyway, so technically the territory is international waters. And please tell me how much more intelligent a whale is compared to cattle and tuna. How intelligent does an animal have to be before it becomes morally wrong to consume?
Posted by Marielle, 19/01/2010 11:18:41 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
There is one basic problem with your article. You claim that this collision occured in Australian territorial waters. Only Australian, United Kingdom, France and Norway (the other nations claiming waters around Antarctica) recognize Australia's claim to those waters. Those nations comprise less than 2.5 per cent of the world's population. That's a pretty small base of support from which to launch a claim for that much of the ocean. Considering Norway kills more whales than Japan I wouldn't count on a lot of support from them.
Posted by Tony, 19/01/2010 11:31:54 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Sea Shepherds hippies? I think not, real men more like. The hippies are those such as yourself Gav who sit and criticise that the world should run in a touchy feely way where sitting down we can resolve any ANY issue BS! Actually I was at a loss to follow your train of thought in this article.
Posted by STFU, 19/01/2010 12:02:06 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
The Sea Shepherd are only there because Kevin Rudd has ignored his pre-election promises to stop Japan's illegal whaling. Doing the job that Sea Shepherd are doing, without the legal support of Australia and without harming lives in an effort to protect "protected" whales, is an awesome job, not for the faint-hearted. It is easy to criticise but the cowards are our leaders who are deferring to Japan's economic powers.
Posted by Milly, 19/01/2010 1:14:39 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
The Sea Shepherd people are NOT "fanatics". What the ILLEGAL whale POACHERS are doing is actually the danger here. They are doing ILLEGAL so-called "business". And no their so-called "scientic whaling" is nothing more than a SHAM.
Posted by Kristy, 19/01/2010 2:29:05 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
Japan and Australia are at loggerheads unnecessarily because we lack decisive leadership in our country. This is not "research" and we never believed it was. This illegal whale poaching in the Antarctic is clearly a case of Japan breaking numerous international and domestic laws, and the Antarctic Treaty. It should never have been allowed to continue and now the problem has escalated. The problem is lack of leadership and a NGO should not be under the firing line and criticised because they are doing the job our national security vessels should be doing.
Posted by Vivienne, 19/01/2010 8:28:05 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
It is time to boycott all Japanese products until the whale slaughter stops. It's simple - just don't buy Jap crap. Do this simple thing, be vocal about it, and encourage friends and neighbours to do the same.
Posted by Paul, 19/01/2010 9:30:23 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
1 | 2  |  next >
The Rant
The Courier's Gavin McGrath provides a unique analysis of issues that delight and/or torment him.

Most popular articles


Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...