News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Ballarat abuse victims welcome Pope's apology 

Ballarat abuse victims welcome Pope's apology

21/07/2008 11:21:00 AM
BALLARAT victims of clerical sexual abuse have welcomed a papal apology made to Australian victims.

But they say the Pope's words must be backed up with "action" from the Catholic Church.

On Saturday Pope Benedict XVI said he was "deeply sorry" for the suffering endured by victims of abuse by Catholic priests and brothers in Australia.

"Indeed I am deeply sorry for the pain and suffering the victims have endured and I assure them that, as their pastor, I too share in their suffering," Pope Benedict said.

"These misdeeds, which constitute so grave a betrayal of trust, deserve unequivocal condemnation."

One victim, "David", was sexually abused by a priest while a pupil at a Ballarat Catholic primary school in the 1970s.

He said he broke down when he heard the Pope's words on Saturday.

"I cried. I just cried," David said.

"We can finally start to move on (but) it's got to be backed up with some real action."

Melbourne high school teacher Stephen Woods, who was abused by three Catholic clergy members in Ballarat, said he was "relieved" to hear the apology and said it would vindicate the "thousands" of clerical abuse victims in Australia.

But he said his "heart sank" when he heard the Pope call on Catholics to back the efforts of local bishops to address the issue.

"It's the bishops who continue to stonewall victims from obtaining proper justice in the courts.

"I would like to see the Pope instruct the bishops to say who will take responsibility in each of the orders for the civil actions when litigation is taken."

Ballarat Catholic Bishop Peter Connors said he thought the Saturday mass at St Mary's Cathedral, with all Australian bishops present, was the right place for the Pope to make the apology.

"But it's up to us, as the Australian church, to respond to that," Bishop Connors said.

The bishop said he had met victims over his 11 years in Ballarat, and that the church had implemented procedures that "make sure we are going to act far more appropriately than we might have in the past".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It's all very well for the Pope to offer apologies and I commend his efforts, but what is George Pell and all the other dishops doing. As head of the Church in Australia, he must take responsibility for what has happened. His people apologised to the Foster family then the Church lawyers changed the story. I have a friend here in Ballarat who has a signed letter from Pell, categorically stating that while he was in charge, no sexual abuse took place. This has been proven to be manifestly wrong and my friend has been waiting for a response for 18 months and guess what? Pell's silence is deafening. The church will never get over the legacy these terrible crimes have left behind until it has the guts to face up to what happened at a local level and be honest to the people. The other point that needs to taken in to account is that no transparency will eventuate whilst the Church carries out it's own investigations behind closed doors. No other organization that I know of can investigate it's own crimes. In cases of rape and sexual interference the police are always called in. What is going on here? Sorry Bishop Connors but I see no evidence of "making sure we are going to act far more appropriately than we might have in the past".
Posted by Dissapointed Mick on 21/07/2008 9:55:26 AM
The credibility, integrity and influence of the Roman Catholic Church has been greatly diminished by this continuing scandal. I will repeat here what I said after Pope Benedict XVI returned to Rome after visiting the United States in April. http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/pa/18035269.html Published on April 23, 2008 CHURCH NEEDS TO ACT ON SEX ABUSE By Maureen Paul Turlish Pope Benedict XVI last week lamented his "deep shame" over the clergy sex-abuse scandal, decrying the "enormous pain" that individuals and communities have suffered from "gravely immoral behavior" by priests. He vowed to "do what is possible so this cannot happen again in the future." Do what is possible? Not one bishop has been removed from office because of his own complicity, collusion or cover-up of the church's continuing sexual-abuse problems. Nor has anyone been forced to resign for violating Canon Law or criminal or civil laws. Even when the Archdiocese of Boston imploded in 2002, church authorities were quick to say former Archbishop Bernard Law's resignation had nothing to do with his leadership style. Do what is possible? Some bishops in their own dioceses continue to fight the release of records, even the names and locations of known predators, in their episcopal jurisdictions. The Portland, Oregon, Archdiocese has been dribbling records out to the public as recently as last week while the Archdiocese of Los Angeles continues to oppose releasing its thousands of files. Rest assured that the institutional church's loud protestations of commitment to victims of sexual abuse in the future offer neither absolution nor justice for the sins and the crimes of the past. The "scandal" that attaches to the church's sexual abuse problems is that there was, in fact, a cover-up of unimaginable proportions that aided and abetted the continued sexual abuse and molestation of thousands of children, as well as young men, women and vulnerable adults. Do what is possible? The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has hailed diocesan programs across the country celebrating this month as Child Abuse Awareness Month. "We can never rest when it comes to protecting children and teenagers," said Bishop Gregory Aymond, chairman of the conference's Committee for the Protection of Children and Young People. However, Catholic conferences and church lobbyists in such states as Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, Colorado and Ohio have been ruthless in their opposition to the complete removal of statutes of limitation regarding the sexual abuse of minors. Superior Court Judge Robert B. Young ruled last Wednesday that Delaware's Child Victims Act does not violate the state constitution, based on the fact that federal courts already have set a precedent for upholding similar laws. The act was passed in 2007 to eliminate the civil statute of limitations for child-sexual abuse and to allow a two-year window during which previously barred suits could be filed. Removing statutes of limitations is the single most effective method of holding sexual predators - and any possibly complicit or enabling individuals or institutions - accountable along with the inclusion of "window legislation" such as Delaware's to bring forth previously time-barred cases of abuse. I love my church, and together with Pope Benedict XVI I am ashamed, deeply ashamed of what has been done to children in God's name. I fully expect my church leadership to initiate actions that more faithfully follow their words. This is possible. Anything less is "sounding brass and tinkling cymbals" (1 Corinthians 13:1-2) because words without action remain hollow. ----- Sister Maureen Paul Turlish of Delaware is a victims' advocate and educator who can be reached at: maureenpaulturlish@yahoo.com
Posted by Maureen Paul Turlish on 21/07/2008 10:19:15 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

MOST POPULAR

30 Jun 09 | Together with the worldwide outpouring of grief ranging from mass dance tributes in a Philippines prison to an Eiffel Tower moonwalk, the death of Michael Jackson has brought an extraordinary collection of tributes from world political figures.
The Courier - McDonalds Online Footy Tipping Comp
 
Photo Sales
 
Send Us News
 
Design and Print
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...