News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Decision on way for statement for wind farm 

Decision on way for statement for wind farm

15 Jul, 2008 11:38 PM
A DECISION will be made in coming months on whether the Stockyard Hill Wind Farm needs an Environmental Effects Statement.

Wind Power made the referral to the Planning Minister Justin Madden last month for its proposed 282-turbine wind farm.

If Mr Madden finds the project would have a significant environmental impact, the company must prepare an EES document.

Wind Power engineer Ross Richards said the company had worked with the Department of Sustainability and Environment to reduce possible environmental impacts, working out the best location for the turbines.

The submission to Mr Madden contains various studies done on the project, including a preliminary landscape and visual assessment, a detailed flora and fauna study and the targeted Brolga assessment.

Mr Richards said the studies had significantly impacted the project, reducing the original number of turbines from 370 to 282.

In Wind Power's referral to Mr Madden, it was the company's professional advice that because of those studies, an EES would not be warranted.

But Western Plains Landscape Guardians Group believe a statement is needed, saying the project would threaten certain wildlife species.

The group is opposed to the project because they believe the Western Volcanic Plains area is unique, with critically endangered grasslands.

Spokeswoman Cassie Franzose said some group members who lived on neighbouring properties were concerned about the impact on the visual amenity and property values.

"It's just the sheer size of it that concerns us, there are several wind farms in the Pyrenees Shire, and this will be the place with the most turbines," Mrs Franzose said.

Meanwhile, the layout of the wind farm is ready for community consultation, in the next stage of the project.

People are invited to have input at an information day on Saturday, July 26, at Lake Goldsmith Hall between 11am and 3pm.

The information will be used to prepare the planning application, which is expected to be lodged late this year.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Wind Power have conducted themselves in a very poor manner. They refuse to have a public meeting with the concerned residents. Newbold and Buckle should answer the questions, including the terrible contract with the landholder, which will leave them having to decommission these things.
Posted by Maude, 16/07/2008 12:54:24 AM
When will the company hold a public forum so we can ask questions? To plant hundreds of turbines in an area without meeting with the community to answer the issues is very poor indeed.
Posted by sally, 16/07/2008 12:57:31 AM
If the Labor Party had any consideration for the communities surrounding the Western Plains the Minister would demand an EES for the site.
Posted by Will, 16/07/2008 7:10:18 AM
What is happening around the edges of Ballarat? We are going to being surrounded by turbines. Ballarat won't be known for the goldfields but for being an industrial junkyard.
Posted by Steve, 16/07/2008 8:16:36 AM
How could a project of this size not require a EES? If it is not required then we can truly see the way the present government treat rural Victorians. The only reason the size of this proect has been reduced is the fact that a number of informed landholders refused to sign a contract that put all legal liability on the landholders.
Posted by peter, 16/07/2008 8:48:24 AM
The consultation process at Stockyard Hill undertaken by Wind Power Pty Ltd has been a complete farce. Directors Newbold and Buckle are nowhere to be seen. Just Ross Richards peddling the company's propaganda that no-one will be adversely affected. It's time for Madden, Batchelor, Brumby and Helper to sit up and listen.
Posted by Kate, 16/07/2008 10:32:31 AM
WindPower's "professional advice" cannot be considered to be unbiased. If it is so sure of itself it has nothing to fear from the EES that a truly democratic process demands. When a project of this huge scale is considered, the onus is on the proponent to address the environmental impacts in an open, transparent way. The Courier should be supporting this requirement.
Posted by Rainy Creek, 16/07/2008 10:42:10 AM
If studies done have reduced the number of turbines by 88 to 282, that means there are problems. Why are we building more and more ugly,noisy wind farms that are only about 19% efficient (not 30%), that harm native birds and animals, that farmers will have to decommission at their cost one day, that tear communities apart and which won't replace base load coal fired power??? Bigger is not better. We should be using more efficient turbine types that produce more, last longer and have less bad effects on localities.
Posted by McGoo, 16/07/2008 11:06:26 AM
An EES is critical when such a large scheme is being planned and could have a dramatic effect upon wildlife.
Posted by Frank, 16/07/2008 11:16:36 AM
So, Wind Power believe, "..it was the company's professional advice that because of those studies, an EES would not be warranted." "Professional advice" from whom? Wind Power's Director Andrew Newbold, perhaps? (Mr. Newbold is a lawyer after all). Maybe a Wind Power-employed engineer? Whatever the source of this "professional advice", it defies all reason, common sense and perhaps, the law. One is forced to ask why this particular project, spread over such a large are of land, should not be subject to the same stringent environmental investigation requirements as other projects, many of them smaller? The answer is, "It should not". Big Business may ask anything it wishes of government, but if Planning Minister Madden permits this project to proceed without an EES, it leaves Minister Madden, the Planning Ministry and the entire Brumby government wide open to allegations "special rules for special projects... and people". The matter is in fact so serious, the legal and political consequences so potentially damaging to the Brumby government, that any attempt to provide a green light without an EES should be challenged all the way to the High Court.
Posted by Brook, 16/07/2008 12:08:58 PM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Photo Sales
 
Paperboy
 
Design and Print
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...