News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 First Choice Ballarat knock back: welfare group praises move 

First Choice Ballarat knock back: welfare group praises move

26 Jan, 2012 06:04 PM
BALLARAT’S advancing booze war may have been halted by a council decision to block a new First Choice Liquor Superstore from opening in the CBD.

Health and social welfare organisations have praised Ballarat City Council for rejecting the proposal on Wednesday night, but the decision could face a challenge at VCAT.

The proposed 1200-square metre discount liquor store, on the Sam’s Warehouse site at the corner of Peel and Little Bridge streets, would have been less than 500 metres from dozens of businesses selling alcohol.

Ballarat Community Health chief executive officer Robyn Reeves said if the store had been approved, it would have likely led to more alcohol-related health problems in the community.

“If you think about it logically Ballarat doesn’t need more alcohol outlets.

“Council’s own health and wellbeing policy talks about the harm alcohol can do – this would have been a backwards step,” she said.

Ms Reeves said research from national Preventative Health Taskforce showed that increased numbers of alcohol retailers lead to greater consumption.

“A great big new outlet leads to the possibility of a price war, and that would be an unhealthy thing in terms of increased drinking.

“The taskforce has recommended an increase in the price of alcohol for that reason.”

The Courier was unable to contact a spokesperson for First Choice Liqour owners Coles yesterday, but a representative told Wednesday’s council meeting the decision would cost the Ballarat economy $2 million in construction work and around 20 jobs.

Ms Reeves said the jobs could be created in other areas of the economy.

“And additional money spent on alcohol would not have been a good thing for Ballarat,” she said.

If approved, Ballarat would have joined Bendigo and Shepparton as the only cities in regional Victoria to have both First Choice and Dan Murphy’s.

The application noted that within 500 metres from the proposed Ballarat store, existing packaged liquor sales are already available from Liquorland and Woolworths Liquor.

Within the same area there are 27 businesses with existing liquor licenses, including pubs and restaurants.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
That's crap. It would of introduced competitive pricing. I doubt it has anything to do with where it is located as Coles backs onto it...Which is owned by Wesfarmers along with 1st choice Liquor. The only people who would do damage to themselves with Alcohol are the people silly enough to bring it upon them selves.

Im still surprised the council passed up on making a bit of coin out of all of this.

Posted by Leigh, 27/01/2012 7:04:37 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
I welcome this decision. There are enough alcohol retail outlets already in Ballarat. Saturation point in this market reached a peak some time ago. Remember, as far as major companies are concerned it is always profit before people. It is no different in this instance.
Posted by Eyes Open, 27/01/2012 7:40:32 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Good move council for knocking this back, but I'll bet you a slab of V.B that VCAT will overturn this decision and allow it
Posted by correction, 27/01/2012 9:14:09 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
great decision. I hope they don't get overturned by vact.
Posted by denusha, 27/01/2012 10:15:19 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
This seems like a simplistic way of tackling the problem. Based on this principle I expect council to knock back any new car yard developments or petrol stations to bring down the incessant hoon factor that exists in Ballarat.
Posted by The Baron, 27/01/2012 10:44:54 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Nonsense. So another retailer will increase the amount a person drinks? By that logic, the more car yards we have, the more people will own a car.
Posted by Wolf, 27/01/2012 1:08:44 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
I hope that VCAT do over turn this decision, it's little thing called fair trading. Why would Ballarat City Council allow Woolworths to run Dan Murphy's as the monopoly liquor barn in the city and not give the other major retail player Coles an equal chance?

Just because there's an extra outlet does not automatically mean that people are going to buy more alcohol. It just offers Ballarat more opportunity for competative pricing. That's where the welfare groups have this one wrong.

Posted by Clint, 27/01/2012 1:49:00 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
Quote", but a representative told Wednesday’s council meeting the decision would cost the Ballarat economy $2 million in construction work and around 20 jobs."

I say this is a lie, and it has not lost Ballarat $2million or 20 jobs, the indirect loss would have been much much greater from the increased alcohol consumption, extra sick days from work, poor work performance, theft to buy alcohol, increased waiting lists at hospitals due to alcohol consumption side effects and then there is the huge social cost of violence and counseling costs

Posted by creative numbers, 27/01/2012 2:01:22 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
Oh dear, sounds like business interest at play here. Alcohol outlets do not increase anti social behaviour, it's that some consumers can't handle the effect. I love a wine and I don't get agro. Competition is the reason in this case.

The council would do better to restrict junk food outlets- looking at fat people get's me agro!

Posted by society?, 28/01/2012 12:45:53 AM, on The Ballarat Courier

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Town Hall
Town Hall
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...