News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Lake Wendouree: $5m price tag to refill 

Lake Wendouree: $5m price tag to refill

14 Mar, 2010 11:22 AM
CENTRAL Highlands Water will charge almost $5 million to transmit about $1 million worth of water through its infrastructure to refill Lake Wendouree.

That's the charge under CHW's water transmission policy.

But the $5 million price tag is not deterring organisers of the Fill Our Lake Campaign in their efforts to raise funds to buy a water right to restore the city icon back to its former glory. They believe

any figure is achievable.

CHW chairman John Barnes acknowledged yesterday that while the cost to buy the water was $500,000 to $1 million, the transmission fee to get the water to the lake was $4.9 million.

"I don't want Central Highlands Water to be seen as the party-poopers here, but the people behind this campaign have failed to do their basic homework," Mr Barnes said.

Under the CHW water transmission policy, people who want to purchase water are charged a standard fee of $1.40 per kilolitre.

Figures show that Lake Wendouree needs 3500 megalitres of water, meaning that under the standard fees that would be a bill of $4.9 million for the transmission of the water alone. It is believed another

$500,000 would be needed to actually purchase the water.

Earlier this week Natures Cargo owner Graham Wilkie announced the campaign to raise community funds for a water right to buy the 3500 megalitres needed to fill the lake immediately. At the time

the campaign was launched it was believed that up to $1 million was needed to buy the water.

However, Mr Barnes said buyers must pay for water purchased in the Goulburn Valley system to be transmitted.

"There also needs to be assurances that the water is fully treated. There are technical issues in delivering water from the White Swan Reservoir to Lake Wendouree. If the water bought is not part of the

reticulation system, those buying it must invest in alternative ways of delivering the water," Mr Barnes said.

He said those behind the campaign to refill the lake should have made basic inquiries about likely costs and technical issues. "Their $1 million price tag is way off the mark."

However, the campaign's organiser is not deterred by the higher figure to refill the lake. "It's all achievable . . . its not unrealistic," Mr Wilkie said.

"I am confident that any amount of money to be raised is achievable. Irrespective of what the price tag is, the community wants the lake to be refilled."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Was mr. Barnes once a lawyer. I love the way people throw figures around, when it’s not their money. $500,000 to $1 million, why not $500,000 to $550,000. Don't you know what things cost or are you so out of touch with the way it used to be that you just don't give a DAM? Ha, this is why our rates cost so much, as you people at chw have no idea except how to receive money. Your comments in the article above are the reasons people hate chw. Maybe your pay cheque is in accordance with the figures YOU throw around, but the quality of our water since you have been at the helm is nothing short of deplorable, and if your on anything more than $1000pw I am embarrassed for you and put my hand up for your job, with input from the community. The Courier should do an article on how the water is delivered to the community from chw, ha, and why you'd rather let the pipes leak rather than fix them yourself. There’s a story, lol. Like to see you, mr. Barnes in the hole fixing one of the pipes, without your mask. I am sick to my stomach in how more money gets spent on talking about a project than the actual cost of it. Ballarats water once was the best on Earth, now its crap. ??
Posted by Typical CHW, 13/03/2010 2:12:20 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Does that mean if we spend 5 Mill on filling the lake, with 1 mill being water, hmm that sounds logical. I suppose the City Council and the Water Board will go ahead with it anyway.... For those people who are so concern over it, you pay for it. I'm not. Then again the minority will prevail and get their way.
Posted by Andrew, 13/03/2010 3:36:31 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Are you saying Mr Barnes that water to fill a lake must be treated !, i dont think anyone plans to drink this water.
Posted by david, 13/03/2010 3:40:27 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
what a joke seriously has anyone actually to to think that we have more pressing issues like the long term sustainability of or drinking water instead of wasting time money and water on a SWAMP cos thats all it is and every has been that will dry up next summer anyway wake up ballarat disgusted
Posted by concerned, 13/03/2010 4:34:00 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
I have an idea, how about all those flash house owners who reside around the lake put their money into the lake instead of their flash homes and cars! As for me, I'm looking for a job!
Posted by UNEMPLOYED ABORIGINAL, 13/03/2010 6:08:51 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
OMG! I couldnt belive that another $1million was being considered as burnt offering. Oh sorry, not $1million, $5million, say it quickly and it doesnt sound a lot does it, well actually yes it does. But it seems that its okay because "It's all achievable . . . its not unrealistic," and "I am confident that any amount of money to be raised is achievable. Irrespective of what the price tag is, the community wants the lake to be refilled." What absolute codswollop, how could anyone seriously consider spending $5million filling the lake, not fixing it, filling it??? This project is being touted as being for the public good, implying people want to spend $5m on water for an evaporation pond, that could be believed if you didnt read the paper or talk to people in Ballarat, mmmm consider this: "Billions are wasted on ineffective philanthropy. Philanthropy is decades behind business in applying rigorous thinking to the use of money"- Michael Porter As McEnroe said "you cannot be serious"?
Posted by al, 13/03/2010 6:13:24 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
This should not deter the business and tourism people in favour of filling the lake. This significantly higher cost is still well under the alleged annual revenue loss of $10 million per year. It shouldn't deter them, but perhaps they need a new number-cruncher first...........
Posted by Ed, 13/03/2010 6:35:01 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
The community couldnt give two hoots about refilling the lake mate, the community stretches far beyone your golf buddies and your neighbours. I must confess that i laughed myself silly that a bloke who manages a company which uses vehicles to deliver its goods didnt factor the transportation costs into the original sum.
Posted by Fish1470, 13/03/2010 6:36:22 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Why is this still being discussed? There are serious issues that need addressing in this community.
Posted by Chris, 13/03/2010 6:36:45 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
What a crock.... It is our infrastructure...They only lease it. Get with the program CHW... Oh that's right you are broke from being badly managed in the first place.
Posted by Whynot, 13/03/2010 6:57:31 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles


Ballarat Community Health Nie
 
Begonia Festival
 
Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...