News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Moorabool Shire Council denies dog permit 

Moorabool Shire Council denies dog permit

16 Feb, 2010 11:27 PM
THE pleas of a Beremboke couple to keep 30 dogs on their property fell on deaf ears last night, as Moorabool Shire councillors unanimously voted to deny them a permit.

Melinda and Les Paxton addressed councillors at a meeting at Bacchus Marsh last night to defend themselves against claims in a council report that they had as many as 59 dogs on their property at one time.

The couple made a retrospective claim to house the 30 animals on their Marshalls Lane property.

"The whole thing has got out of hand a little bit," Mr Paxton said.

"There have never been 59 dogs on the property," Mr Paxton said."There were 46 and when (the council worker) told us we could only have 30, we put the rest up for sale on the internet and got rid of them."

Neighbouring property owners complained about dogs escaping, excessive noise and people shooting kangaroos to feed the dogs.

Council compliance officers also reported that dogs were chained to trees and cars, kept in cages with concrete floors without sufficient water, and that raw meat was thrown on the ground for the dogs to eat.

Mr Paxton said he had quickly complied with any conditions council officers had instructed him on.

"We put up fences before the due date and the vet microchipped 30 dogs. If they were in poor condition the vet would have done something about it," he said.

He said an RSPCA officer had cleared the couple of mistreatment of the animals and claimed the lack of appropriate waste management was due to council red tape.

"I can't put in an effluent pit until the shire says how."

The report of the council compliance officer said objections to the permit application were based on the fact Mr Paxton had a history of non-compliance with the number of dogs on the property and with the registration of dogs.

It also said investigations revealed Mr Paxton was running a puppy farm, despite his claims the animals were kept as pets.

The council unanimously rejected the application.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"I can't put in an effluent pit until the shire says how." You do what other businesses do, you engage a company that can design and construct the pit. Thanks to the council for the decision. Now it looks like they will both have to get real jobs. Why not open a child care centre?
Posted by sjc, 18/02/2010 7:37:16 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Yes they certainly look fit for running a childcare centre, don't they. Ferals breeding ferals, me thinks.
Posted by Dave, 18/02/2010 8:21:13 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Thumbs up to council. At least now there is one less puppy farm to feed the epidemic of unloved and neglected dogs who spend most of their time alone in suburban backyards, bored or anxious and fretting. You only have to wander around the suburbs of Ballarat (especially the new estates) to hear the yaps, barks and howls of miserable dogs longing for attention that they rarely get, whilst inadvertently destroying the peace and quiet for those that are stuck at home to suffer it.
Posted by Toon, 18/02/2010 9:29:21 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Can someone explain to me why this even had to go to a vote? Another mob trying to line their own pockets at the poor animals' expense. Thousands of beautiful dogs are put down every month because scum like this are breeding any dog to any dog, housing them in poor conditions and usually selling the puppies off to pet shops, where they are bought by people impulsively. If you aren't a registered breeder of pedigree dogs, you shouldn't have more than two or three as pets, it's just that simple. And if pet shops were banned from selling puppies and kittens, these damn puppy farms would close overnight. It's a ridiculous situation, these puppy farms should not exist, period. Then there will be less suffering for these poor defenceless animals.
Posted by Sereena, 18/02/2010 8:23:46 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
I am a registered breeder and have more buyers than puppies, so I can pick and choose who gets my puppies. We get follow ups on them, get feedback and offer to rehome them if the buyer's situation changes. We only have one breed and are all pedigreed. We know the temperament and we give advice to new buyers for life. We do not sell a puppy 'till we are pretty confident the new owners are worthy. The problem here is pet shops who help create this demand and the RSPCA for trying to tell people cross breeds are better than pure breeds. Registered breeders have strict conditions to abide by, cross bred breeders do not. The RSPCA should be recommending people buy from registered breeders of pure bred dogs. There are still a few bad apples doing this, but it is more controlled.
Posted by breeder, 19/02/2010 10:03:42 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
i think what they done was allright! NEVER once did the breed there dogs to other dogs of the same family i can sure as hell vouch for these people, theses dogs always had water and food!!! and yes were locked up but ALWAYS LET OUT and locked up at the end of the day and as for a neighbour complianing sorry to say there are none for at least 8 kms away so that was a load off bull we owned this house before these people did so if you have something to say take it up with them not over the internet!!! they would never do such a thing and im a dog breeder my self and they done the same as iv done and my dogs are HEALTHY and FIT!!! and the rspca say u can have a dog on a lead as long as there let off also they can be locked in a cage as long as they can turn around these people have done NOTHING WRONG the council should be out there hetting the real animal abusers!!!
Posted by Tara gangur, 19/02/2010 9:39:44 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
This breeder obviously doesn't take what they do seriously enough to be granted a permit and by the sounds of things have never invested back into their kennels to improve their facility. Breeders like these are being shut down one by one and eventually breeders will be forced to run their kennels in a professional manner which is a good thing. If the dogs are healthy and well cared for it shouldn't matter what the size of the kennel is. Breeders large and small should be encouraged to do that right thing and if they do they can be assured by council that they have a future i.e. their permit won’t be suddenly taken away from them. This will give breeders the confidence to make the initial investment in their facility and then continue to upgrade and improve. Nobody wants to invest large sums of money into anything that may not have a future. It’s only registered breeders (with council not just the Canine Associations) who can be regulated to make sure they are doing the right thing.
Posted by Lumley, 24/02/2010 11:51:04 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Never purchase a pet over the Internet. The Beremboke couple is unfortunately one of many puppy farmers that allegedly advertise their puppies and other dogs over the Internet or newspapers. Behind the purchase of a cute puppy, hides the parents in a stingy, smelly shed, with very little socialisation with humans, often lacking in comfortable bedding and needing extensive grooming, not to mention the need of veterinary care. If you have ever visited a puppy mill or backyarder and witnessed the cruel extremities of such hell holes, you would never, never purchase a puppy again from either a pet shop or via the Internet and newspapers. It's thumbs up to the Moorabool Shire councillors for unanimously voting to deny another notorious puppy farmer couple a permit to breed and saving some dogs from extreme brutality. But what about the rest of the non-registered or non-compliant puppy farms out there? Time to pressure the government that factory farming of companion animals is socially not acceptable and extremely inhumane. Bring in legislation to ban puppy and kitten farming completely and stop the sale of animals in pet shops, over the Internet and via the newspapers.
Posted by Julie-Anne, 24/02/2010 10:46:15 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
To Tara Gungur, I know the previous owner, and the one before that. Again I will say, pet shops should not be allowed to sell puppies or kittens. Goldfish and budgies are about it. And the RSPCA are useless. They only go where the publicity is. There was a horse property in Geelong that was reported to them for years, did nothing, then when it hit the papers they were all over it just to get the publicity. I never give them money now and will never while these fools try and promote cross breeds over pure breeds.
Posted by breeder, 25/02/2010 9:54:13 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
Les and Melinda Paxton should be put down. Bring back the DEATH PENALTY. I would be very happy to pay for it.
Posted by Animal Lover, 26/02/2010 11:47:02 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Les and Melinda Paxton address councillors
Les and Melinda Paxton address councillors

Most popular articles

Regent Cinema

Photo Sales
 
Paperboy
 
Design and Print


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...