News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 PM Rudd visit: home birth group slams Rudd's garden no show 

PM Rudd visit: home birth group slams Rudd's garden no show

18 Feb, 2010 12:46 AM
PRO-HOME birth protesters travelled to Ballarat from across the region and interstate but did not get a glimpse of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd yesterday.

A group of about 60 women and children, many holding placards, gathered outside the Ballarat Town Hall at 10.40am.

But the group decided to move the protest to the Ballarat Botanical Gardens at 11am because they believed Mr Rudd would attend the Prime Minister's Avenue to unveil his bust.

What Women Want founder Justine Caines from Scone in NSW said Mr Rudd's non-appearance at the gardens was "cowardly", and showed he was not prepared to engage with the protesters.

She said the women were making a stand against an amendment to a senate bill that would require a formal agreement between midwives and doctors.

"Unless the individual doctor sanctions the practice (of home birth) it can't take place," she said.

Ballarat woman Lynda Russell gave birth to her two children at home.

"I'm here today to support home-birthing families having a choice," she said.

* Meanwhile, protesters concerned about the growing number of wind turbines across the region converged on Ballarat High School.

The group carried placards indicating their frustration with both state and federal governments.

Scotsburn resident Belinda Wehl said health problems and the proximity of turbines to homes were the main issues.

"The number of people who were initially happy with the wind farms, who are now suffering health issues is telling, and makes you realise there must be something going on," Ms Wehl said.

Farmer Jim Elsworth and his son Will Elsworth, both from Smeaton, were concerned about the number of wind turbines close to their property.

"We'd like some `pollie' to have a public meeting and explain the benefits of the wind turbines to us," Jim Elsworth said.

"We are tired of being pushed around by dills who won't meet with us."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Rudd was a dud. He avoided local people who gathered to see him whether they were the nurses or the people protesting the useless windfarms that are causing sickness throughout the areas where they are spreading, devasting people who have to live near them.
Posted by bruce, 19/02/2010 7:05:18 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
It's a pity that the protestors didn't get to see Kev in Ballarat. However, I've heard he hangs out at a place called Parliament House, somewhere in Canberra...
Posted by Joe Bloggs, 19/02/2010 7:24:50 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Mr Rudd's non-appearance at the gardens was "cowardly". Cowardly? What a load of rubbish. Ever thought your group just didn't research the PM's visit and actually find out where he would be and at what time. I hope you are better at organising a home birth than a protest.
Posted by sjc, 19/02/2010 7:34:22 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Well Joe Bloggs, funnily enough, several thousand protesters rallied at Parliament House in September in the pouring rain. Mr Rudd didn't give us the honour of his presence or interest that day either. SJC, it's a bit hard to plan where to be when the PM's office was only advising where he'd be 15 minutes prior to him being there. Please explain a logical way of getting over 100 protesters with children in tow to anywhere with 15 minutes notice.
Posted by Megan, 19/02/2010 7:59:52 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Although I agree with the concept of mothers having freedom of choice, I for one, can't really see the importance of where a birth takes place. I think the end result is the only very important issue - a healthy baby, and that even though hospitals may restrict and impose some conditions on the birthing process, and interfere with the mother's desires, they really are only trying to keep everyone safe. In the end, the process is only of secondary importance. Not worth protesting too much about to my mind. There are many more pressing and damaging issues in this world that need to be addressed.
Posted by june, 19/02/2010 8:08:01 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
It's a pity that Mr Rudd could not meet with more people who have concerns. I don't expect Mr Rudd to be able to meet with everyone or he wouldn't have time for much else, but that is why we have local politicians to represent us, but the question is do they? Do they take concerns onboard and relay them? In my experience, especially with state pollies, you are wasting your breath talking to them. The federal member is a little better but I wonder if she has done anything to relay concerns to the government?
Posted by Mick, 19/02/2010 8:13:18 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
I thought the PM was here for the community of Ballarat, but we were ambushed by non locals who may have a worthy cause but we should have used the oppurtunity to focus on Ballarat's issues.
Posted by mzj, 19/02/2010 8:15:02 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Megan - there isn't a logical way. I'm pretty sure that's the point. Why would any politician actively seek a "marred by protesters" news story?
Posted by Matt in Mt Helen, 19/02/2010 8:29:59 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
One thing I will say to the pro homebirthers, you could be jeopardising the life of your baby, yourselves and this would impact heavily on your families of course. I think it's selfish, the statistics are clear - a percentage of women and babies will die during a home birth. Anybody wanting to have a home birth should be unable to sue anyone if something goes wrong, there is no way that I would stick my neck out to assist in a home birth. The newspapers over the years have reported many home birth disasters.
Posted by whoever, 19/02/2010 8:34:52 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
whoever - while I don't particularly agree with the protesters and their complaints about the PM not being where they thought he would be, I don't think you can actually quote "statistics" and the "newspapers" and then not actually provide any actual data and still expect to be taken seriously. Having said that, home birth AND hospital birth both come with some level of risk, and I don't see why in both cases doctors should be involved and give the go ahead.
Posted by Anon, 19/02/2010 9:16:29 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
OBJECTION: Arabella Davison and two-year-old Mishka  show their displeasure at an amendment to a senate bill that would require a formal agreement between midwives and doctors to allow a home birth to occur. Picture: Lachlan Bence
OBJECTION: Arabella Davison and two-year-old Mishka show their displeasure at an amendment to a senate bill that would require a formal agreement between midwives and doctors to allow a home birth to occur. Picture: Lachlan Bence

Most popular articles


Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...