News 
 Local News 
 News 
 News Features 
 Ballarat pubs to trial 1am shot ban 

Ballarat pubs to trial 1am shot ban

03 Mar, 2010 02:35 PM
EARLY morning shots are a thing of the past in Ballarat pubs and clubs.

The city's Liquor Accord yesterday struck a deal to ban shots from sale after 1am in all licensed venues in a bid to curb alcohol-fuelled violence.

Straight shots of alcohol, Jager bombs and high potency mixed drinks are all included in the ban.

In addition, all but one of the city's licensed venue operators agreed to trial a 2.30am lockout for six months, bringing the curfew forward from the present 3am cutoff.

Ballarat police Senior Sergeant Tim Argall hailed the licensees' decision to implement the voluntary measures as a positive step in the fight against late night, anti-social behaviour on city streets.

"I think it will certainly have an impact and only time will tell how significant that impact is,'' he said.

"But all these are positive steps towards a safer community in Ballarat.''

The decision to ban the high alcohol drinks in Ballarat follows similar agreements implemented recently by the Liquor Accords of Bendigo and Mildura.

The George Hotel general manager and liquor accord member Brendan Hanrahan said licensees were keen to do their bit to help police and other community groups stem the tide of binge drinking, despite the move potentially costing businesses hundreds of dollars

a night.

"Ballarat was the first in the state to implement a late night lockout and ours is voluntary unlike other regional areas that have theirs forced upon them,'' he said.

"We are always on the front foot looking to work with Victoria Police in promoting initiatives to secure the safety of our late night patrons.''

Mr Hanrahan said while all but one of the accord's licensed venue operators agreed to the 2.30am lockout trial, Ballarat police's preferred 2am lockout was not so warmly welcomed.

"It's one of those things where it's a matter of taking one step at a time. To get everyone involved and agree to the extra half hour was another step forward,'' he said.

"At the end of the six months, we will sit down and reassess.''

While both Mr Hanrahan and Sen Sgt Argall both expressed disappointment the one venue - believed to be The Bridge Hotel - did not agree to the 2.30am curfew, Sen Sgt Argall said ultimately, the Liquor Accord relied on the voluntary participation of licensees.

"It's important to note this is a voluntary agreement,'' he said.

"It's disappointing that all venues haven't take up the opportunity, we would prefer all venues to be part of it, but venues have made their own decision.

"We left it to the licensees to discuss among themselves and see what they wanted to do and its a good decision we have seen today.'

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Blah, blah, blah. Haven't we heard this nonsense before? How many times have clubs and hotels in Ballarat supposedly joined in a "voluntary" code of practice to limit excessive alcohol consumption after a given time? How many have worked because over time venues forget the commitment? Like many out there I only interpret this as an attempt to delay regulation by pretending to address issues without effectively doing so. I have very little confidence this will succeed as venues fail to comply beyond a few weeks of implementation.
Posted by Kibnedyo, 3/03/2010 8:07:51 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
What a ridiculous move. Now it seems I am being told what I can and can't drink at the nightclubs I frequent. As someone that has chosen to drink Jager for years and never become involved in any altercations at all, I challenge the assertion that these drinks by themselves are the cause of late night problems. All this decision will serve to do is force patrons to drink more, and for longer, at home before going out on the town. This will occur at the expense of nightclub owners who will suffer falling revenues. Just because a substance may be abused by some does not mean it is abused by all, and a far more effective move would be to ban the people who are the cause of the problem, rather than banning the drink. What's to stop a patron from buying two pre-mix drinks or a few vodka and Redbulls and sculling them as a replacement? I hope the places I frequent won't be trialling this or they will be losing my business.
Posted by Chris, 3/03/2010 8:27:22 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
All this will result in is people getting drunker on shots and more potent drinks earlier in the night, thus bringing the violent drunks (a minority might I add) on to the streets earlier. It's just shifting the timeframe. I agree @Chris, I enjoy drinking Jager and low alcohol shots because they taste good, not to get outrageously drunk.
Posted by Matt, 3/03/2010 8:40:19 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
How about just not letting scum through the front door. Be more judgemental about people. If they look like trouble (and in Ballarat it's easy to recall who the trouble makers are) then don't let them in. The people who are causing trouble tend to already have a few years of getting their "street cred" up that bouncers should know who to refuse entry to. Alcohol comsumption is merely a contributor to anti-social behaviour. The people who start fights I am sure were more than willing to do so before drinking to excess. They just needed that confidence boost and an excuse to fall back on when they go to court.
Posted by sj, 3/03/2010 8:47:14 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Chris - it's the way of the modern world. We have to police for the stupid minority. Look at the millions of dollars they spent on putting lights and boom gates at every train crossing because the minority failed to give way. Most car laws are in the same boat. It's only going to get worse before it gets better.
Posted by Anon11, 3/03/2010 8:48:15 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
More rubbish, the only way to make the streets safer is to have more police around to discourage the behaviour. Smoke screens for the pollies to hide behind is all this sort of thing is. Another fact overlooked is the time spent waiting for taxis. Surely a faster way out of the central area at closing time would avoid alot of nonsense also. Not blaming the taxi company etc. It's just another factor that contributes to the problem. People will always drink, people will always get drunk and do silly things, it's a part of life. Society as a whole has become more violent, sad but true. We need to look at ways of working with it rather than trying to stop it. How many young drinkers will now have several shots at 12.30am to get in before the curfew and end up even drunker than they would have? Sounds like a way for venues to get more sales on expensive drinks.
Posted by shaggy, 3/03/2010 9:31:19 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
All shots are designed to get you intoxicated fast, however all drinks will do that if you drink enough. Most people don't get agro and want to fight when intoxicated. The server of alcohol has a duty of care when serving on the spot consumption drinks. If the server allows excessive consumption then he fails his duty of care. I can see victims in the future sueing these clubs for this very reason. While most blame is on the person consuming the alcohol and causing the trouble, the clubs still share the blame as per their duty of care.
Posted by david, 3/03/2010 10:32:58 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Why are 95 per cent of patrons going to be punished for the acts of a few? Why are 95 per cent of patrons going to be punished because there are not enough police on the streets to act as a deterrent? Does anyone else think it moronic that this "problem" (I actually see very little violence in Ballarat to be honest) is being blamed on a few types of drinks? Moronic.
Posted by Chris, 3/03/2010 10:40:35 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
What about the people who are kicked out of venues due to excessive drinking or unruly behaviour? It's likely these are the people whom then walk the streets with aggression or stupidity, picking fights etc. There needs to be a way to get these people either home or locked up. Maybe clubs need to take a tiny bit more responsibility on what happens to these people once they have kicked them out? Maybe compulsory placing in a taxi to be sent home or police pick up to be taken to station rather than just sending them onto the streets? Is there the resources for this? Maybe an entrance fee with a taxi home factor included, refunded if patron leaves club with no problems?
Posted by newidea, 3/03/2010 10:45:23 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
So alcohol seems to be a problem on our streets at night. Ever noticed that there seems to be an apparent lack of activities to do at night time in this town other than activities that require a trip to the pub? We've got a community up in arms about how the streets are unsafe and blah blah blah. Why don't we all stop complaining and actually create a nightlife scene in this town that we call the Rat, that revolves around other activities? Why can't we have activities that help to bring out the families at night? Ballarat is a boring, boring town for those that are young and local. The only thing we seem to have is night clubs, so why not try and buck the trend? If we're trying to be so proactive in fighting street violence, why not create events at night that promote a greater sense of community? Try things like on a Saturday night having some night markets that close off part of our main drag, Sturt St, and have markets on the road side for families to come out and inspect and buy. It'll promote a greater police presence and a better night out with local entertainment. Why not try some different initiatives that isn't about being a city of the Killjoy?
Posted by Another approach?, 3/03/2010 10:56:17 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
BOMBS AWAY: The George Hotel barman Rob Petch makes a jager bomb which will be banned in city pubs and clubs after 1am under a new agreement. Picture: Jeremy Bannister
BOMBS AWAY: The George Hotel barman Rob Petch makes a jager bomb which will be banned in city pubs and clubs after 1am under a new agreement. Picture: Jeremy Bannister

Most popular articles

Regent Cinema

Photo Sales
 
Paperboy
 
Design and Print


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Navigate

Classifieds

More Ways to Read

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2010. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...