News 
 Opinion 
 Editorial 
 General 
 Australian Open serves up yet another controversy 

Australian Open serves up yet another controversy

16 Jan, 2012 05:35 PM
AS ALWAYS, there’s more to the Australian Open than just tennis.

From the heat, to crowd clashes and the endless debate about the lack of Australians involved at finals time, the Open always throws up its fair share of controversy.

This year, there has been an unusual tangent, with a statement being made at Melbourne Park yesterday by gay rights activists against comments attributed to Australian tennis great Margaret Court.

Court, revered as one of the great female players of any era, is a senior pastor at Perth’s Victory Life Centre church and has long held views opposing homosexuality.

These views were published again recently during the Labor Party’s debate over same-sex marriage.

Her status as a tennis great is ingrained at Melbourne Park, with one of the prestigious show courts named after her.

Former and current players have been drawn into the debate, as has tournament director Craig Tiley.

Almost all have supported Ms Court’s right to an opinion but few have agreed with it.

This is the point in question for gay rights activists.

It is not possible to lambast a person’s right to an opinion just because you do not agree with it.

It is these values which underpin their movement.

What is more in question is the focus of the debate at the Australian Open.

It is true that as a tennis player of considerable note, the views of Ms Court are likely to be considered with much greater weight than those of lesser standing.

It’s also true that the the sexuality of players, not just in tennis but many elite sports, is subject to greater conjecture and scrutiny than in general society.

It’s why those who hold the contrary view will target the Open this week. The media coverage generated by the event is almost unequalled in Australia.

The question is whether it is appropriate for Ms Court to use her considerable clout to continue to push a cause which is more in tune with values of a bygone era and is it appropriate for activists to counter by targeting our major sporting event?

Either way, the Open has again proved that what happens on the court is in many respects just the central point for a much bigger event which often tells us as much about Melbourne as it does about our sporting prowess.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Ms Court like every Australian has a right to her opinion, it doesn't matter whether we agree or disagree with her. The lady is only expressing her right to freedom of speech. Who are we to judge whether her values are consistent with today or a bygone era? The times may have changed, but people haven't.
Posted by Clint, 17/01/2012 11:57:51 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
She does have a right to her opinion but it seems opinions of celebs have greater weight for the bigoted and stupid. It's not true either that people haven't changed. Most of us have and we belive our same sex friends should have the same rights and recieve the same respect as anyone else.
Posted by Fair go for all, 18/01/2012 10:57:23 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
People haven't changed since biblical times. Rape, adultery, violent crime, theft and perverse behavior have been around since the ten commandments were written. If they these crimes didn't exist back then, then why did somebody bother to write it into the old testiment in first place? My point is that people haven't changed, We call ourselves enlightened but think of this, every generation thinks that it is smarter and more savvy than the generation before it, yet arrogantly it conversely considers itself more wise than the generations that follow it. Think about it. Have people changed?
Posted by Clint, 18/01/2012 11:41:43 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Clint, most people have changed immensely since the 60’s. Women are no longer second class citizens, except in the Catholic Church. Most of us no longer fear people of different cultures, those who aren’t white & Christian or those who are not heterosexual. There’s an increased awareness of the wider world & an increase in wisdom. Ms Court would drag us back to the biblical era when fear, misogyny, superstition & ignorance drove peoples lives. Sadly, some in positions of influence support her.
Posted by Fair go for all, 18/01/2012 12:35:33 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
@Clint, you are right. Nothing has really changed except now women have to work and take care of children and the house. It's ironic that in an era of freedoms, the minority dictate what "should" be said. If you don't support the right movement or activist then you really can find yourself attacked by a tirade of abuse. And I personally witness more attacks for people believing in God than those who don't. The new trend of the anti christ is to accuse those who believe in God as having a psychological disorder. Freedom of speech? Well depends on what you are saying really.
Posted by My thoughts, 23/01/2012 12:54:25 PM, on The Ballarat Courier

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...