News 
 Opinion 
 Editorial 
 General 
 Rudd's behaviour pattern is also evident in his comments 

Rudd's behaviour pattern is also evident in his comments

12/06/2008 11:01:00 PM
PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd has ordered MP Belinda Neal to undergo anger-management counselling because of what he calls a "pattern of behaviour".

Mr Rudd's ultimatum to Ms Neal, issued all the way from Japan, points to a "pattern" in his own behaviour that he may have to address if Labor is to remain a steady ship under his leadership.

On at least two occasions now, Mr Rudd has spoken out publicly on matters without thinking through thoroughly on the consequences.

On both those occasions, it appears he has responded to public outcry rather than logic.

Cases in point are the Belinda Neal affair currently being played out and the recent controversy over the Bill Henson photograph exhibition.

Mr Rudd's reaction this week to Ms Neal's behaviour - which no one will argue was acceptable - has upset some of his own. In particular, female colleagues have accused him of treating women differently to the way a man who behaved similarly would have been.

Of course, both Mr Rudd and acting Prime Minister Julia Gillard have denied this was the case.

Why Mr Rudd chose to handle this matter publicly is unclear. His intervention has overshadowed the positives that had been coming out of his trip to Japan.

This was a matter that would have better been left to be handled by those here at home.

Instead, Mr Rudd is now having to deal with the fallout of a gender war he helped create.

All because he responded as he thought the public would want him to.

The same was the case with the Bill Henson images. Without having seen the images that were the subject of an exhibition at a Sydney gallery, Mr Rudd labelled them "absolutely revolting".

Clearly they weren't, yet he followed the lead he was given by the public.

Populist politics is one thing, and, on occasion, it will marry up with good policy.

But Mr Rudd needs to be very careful that his quest for popularism doesn't come at the expense of wise decision making.

In the scheme of things, these two recent judgements could be described as relatively minor.

The Prime Minister should look at the fallout from both, however, and learn the lessons for next time.

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Well Mr Rudd is still dealing with fluffy stuff and not looking at the hard difficult issues. Easy enough to get some popular political wins on the board with non core issues, but more difficult to fix the hard issues such as Inflation, petrol and food prices. With his mates in all State and Territory governments, the issues that have been discussed so far are ones that the States either could have worked with the former Howard Government with or just refused to fix it forcing public pressure on Howard. It is now time for Mr Rudd to stand up, stop playing popular politics and fix things. If the States are still playing me too politics, then has Mr Rudd the ticker to take the hard stand and do what is right for all Australians and not just for the Labour party and its affiliate the Trade Union movement
Posted by Tony of Ballarat on 16/06/2008 8:25:11 PM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

5/09/2008 | THIS WEEK I turned 40. How does that explain the schoolgirl figure and youthful looks?
Online Personnel
 
McCain
 
University of Ballarat
 
Eclipse Ford
 
RegionalOne Credit Union
 
The Courier - McDonalds Online Footy Tipping Comp
 
MyCareer
 
Domain.com.au