News 
 Opinion 
 Letters to the Editor 
 General 
 Change in education system is happening 

Change in education system is happening

03 Feb, 2012 11:40 AM
THIS week more than 850,000 kids from across Victoria are returning to school after the summer holidays.

Purchases will be made — new uniforms and stationary, pencil cases and school bags. All the gear that signals the excitement of the new school year.

The excitement is justified. The schools that these kids are returning to are vastly different to what they were four years ago, when Labor took over the reins of Australia's education system and backed it with over $65 billion in funding.

As an example, every Victorian student in Years 9-12 will this year have access to a computer, transforming the way our teachers teach and our students learn.

And this is thanks to the Gillard Government's $2.4 billion Digital Education Revolution.

Not only is the way kids are taught changing for the 21st century, we now have a new national curriculum for the new century.

In 2012, Victorian teachers and students will be preapring for the national curriculum, with all four subjects to be taught in classrooms to year 10 in 2012, using the Victorium curriculum website.

When I visit schools across the country, speaking to principals, teachers, parents and students, one of the first things they talk about is the government's Building the Education Revolution program, and what an incredible difference this program has made.

Under the BER program, the government has invested $3.7 billion in Victoria, translating to over 932 classrooms, 599 libraries, 599 multi-purpose halls and 109 science and language centres.

We also care about what happens to students when they finish school, and that's why we are offering greater career opportunities by giving every senior high school student access to a Trade Training Centre.

In Victoria, the government has already spent $275.9 million on 50 Trade Training Centre projects, benefiting 226 schools; just part of the $2.5 billion Gillard government investment across Australia over 10 years.

In 2012, we will also be part of an important debate about the way our schools are funded, with the release of the school funding review and our initial response.

This is the first major review of funding arrangements for Australian schools is more than 30 years, and we'll be talking to school communities throughout the year as a new funding model is developed.

This is set to be a historic year for education and I look forward to building on Labor's vision to provide every student in every school a world-class education.

PETER GARRETT

Minister for School Education, Early Childhood and Youth

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
We all know the recommendations from the funding review will upset the elite schools. Will the Govt and Garrett have the spine to stand up and implement them or do the usual cowtow to wealth?
Posted by Give Me A Break, 3/02/2012 4:56:49 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
The review should also consider the ramifications of forcing children to go to school when they don't respect education or teachers and their parents share the same distainful view. When I went to public school many years ago, a teacher could tell the child who was not at all interested in learning to sit at the back of the class. Now-a-days, public school teachers are being condemned for allowing children to slip through the cracks and some people think the public education system is a subsitute for over all parental responsibility. It's not all about "elitism", maybe sacrifice and quality.
Posted by My thoughts, 4/02/2012 1:38:51 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
Another important fact that is overlooked is how the privates schools take the pressure off public education. If in Ballarat the 3 mid range private schools cost around $4k per student per year fees. That is $80k per year for one class of 20 students (say a teachers salary). If fees increase and parents decided to use public education instead, the Govt needs to fund these students education and depending on the fee increase, it could cost the Govt millions extra as private school becomes too expensive for mid range salaries. It's not all about class distinction and so called elitism.
Posted by My thoughts, 4/02/2012 2:13:31 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
yes it is I'm afraid. this loony idea about privates taking financial burden off the state just flies in the face of reality. Take the time to actually find out just how many millions are being slipped into the already flush bank accounts of the elite schools thanks to Howards policies. The ALP are forever shamed that they didn't have the courage to correct it as soon as they threw him out. If that money was pumped into the govt school system we wouldn't have kids sitting into the current hovels they are in while others have indoor pools.
Posted by Give Me a Break, 6/02/2012 6:45:15 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
The figures for 2008 show the average cost of the government to fund a student at a non government school is approximately $6K. The cost of a student at government school is approximately $11K. Current figures show that the ratio of non government vs government school attendance is about 60% to 40% ratio (non government) so in that case, the government would have to fund an extra $5k per student on approximately 40% of our current students. That is a substantial amount of money to find.

Irony - happy to use 100% of other peoples taxes to fund own child but begrudge 40% of taxes to others.

Posted by My thoughts, 7/02/2012 9:01:09 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
We are the only western country who fund non govt education at the level we do and it's barely with any strings attached. They don't even have to account for what they do with it. This policy alone is responsible for what is emerging in front of our eyes - a residual govt system for kids whose parents have NO CHOICE. But still as long as your kids are ok I guess it's all fine eh?
Posted by Give Me A Break, 7/02/2012 12:33:36 PM, on The Ballarat Courier
No, you are wrong. I firmly believe that the best I can do for my children is to pay for their education and their health insurance. Some parents prefer new cars and holidays and entertainment and utilise the public system. That is their choice. My belief is that people who cannot afford health and education should have access to publically funded education and health but it should be limited to those who really do need it, thus facilitating better public services for those who cannot take care of themselves at that time. Cutting private school funding will burden the public system further.
Posted by My thoughts, 8/02/2012 9:05:05 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Cut it back to what it was before Howard's golden handshake would be a good start. That when the gap widened
Posted by Give Me A Break, 8/02/2012 3:25:43 PM, on The Ballarat Courier

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...