Is our legal system not "innocent until proven guilty"? If so, surely obligation should be on anti-wind farm folks to prove a specific problem.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Why do they even get taken seriously when they're chucking so many complaints myth of infrasound, no return on investment, lack of reliability, bird killing etc any fearmongering nonsense that might stick?
While you can prove something, by definition, it's illogical and impossible to prove nothing.