An online social media survey undertaken by The Courier was abuzz with debate surrounding the move and it seems the public are divided on the idea. Ballarat resident Kelly Taylor backed the move.

“I think this is spot on,” Ms Taylor posted. “They have taken on a role and when they voice their personal opinions, whilst openly stating they are a councillor, I think it looks very unprofessional. Social media, especially getting involved in council related debates is definitely something I believe someone in their position should never do.”

But, Ballarat resident Marcia Johns questioned the motive behind changing the council’s code of conduct.

“Why should an elected representative in a democracy be gagged for voicing an opinion outside of the chamber that may be the voice of those who elect them?” she said.

Another resident, Danny Anderson, questioned why tighter restrictions were necessary. 

“But do we a need a policy to tell our elected officials how to behave?” he wrote. “Common sense should prevail, use social media responsibly, you are representing the city after all.”

Cr Samantha McIntosh who voted against the motion told The Courier said her concerns surrounded the lack of public consultation which had been undertaken on the matter before it was rubber stamped by councillors. She said the meeting was announced at the last minute and did not give residents or councillors enough time to examine the changes. 

“The changes are about making sure we are reasonable and respectful with our public message as a group,” Cr McIntosh said. “I don’t see it is a gagging because I still believe we can have our own views. Instead it emphasises we need to be respectful, transparent and work together as a team.”