ONGOING CONCERNS OVER RAILWAY PRECINCT
I read with interest Ron Egeberg's letter to the editor (The Courier, 8 January) concerning the VRI on the corner of Lydiard and Nolan Street. I was not a great scholar at school, but was taught that whatever you write, no matter how long ago, unless properly researched and factual, can and will be used against you. Having been involved in the VRI for over 50 years, and having done my homework and research of the establishment, l wonder where Mr Egeberg got his information from. The Ballarat VRI was built in the early 1920s and is situated in the 'golden mile' for heritage listing, surrounded by some of Ballarat's great heritage-listed buildings. As for not being used, the Ballarat VRI has 15 community organisations using the facility, whether it be old time dance, karate, bias bowls, snooker and billiards, Probus, and calisthenics, just to name a few. Every night of the week, it is booked out, with the odd daytime activity too. On an average week, between 120 to 140 people use the facility whether it be in the main hall, gymnasium, billiard room or kitchen. Over the past 10 years, with the support of the Federal Government through local member, Catherine King, and local VRI finances, the Institute has refurbished the main hall, Messenger hall (gym), kitchen, ladies toilet, and main entrance; with the men's toilet, and billiard room next on the agenda pending finance and support. The building itself has a few structural problems, but is currently being adhered to and once again, depending on finance, will be rectified in the near future. The current committee, as small as it is, works very hard in maintaining the entire area for current members and public use. Mr Egeberg, your article has caused great panic among members and public users alike. Remember, the VRI is in the Ballarat Central Ward and people don't forget.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
John Wakeling, Secretary, Ballarat VRI
With time to submit a response to the Pellicano proposal for the Station drawing to a close, I would like to suggest that there are other problems with the proposal than it ignoring the potential for it to become a Transport Hub for the city. The Government have steadfastly refused to provide a business case for the precinct despite claiming it is going to revitalize the CBD. The reality is that any commercial activity on the site that duplicates existing facilities will put further financial strains on these businesses. In respect to the apartments that now only have a 50% occupancy rate, a further increase in numbers can only make it harder for existing operators to manage.
A conference centre that caters for a maximum of 300 people simply adds to facilities that already exist and experience tells us that none of the existing facilities operate anywhere near their capacity. The developer has admitted that the proposed operator expects the facility to not be profitable for a number of years so we might well ask the question why should it proceed? In respect to the eight shops proposed with a total of 924 sq. metres of floor area, one can only wonder how they can be profitable. Any retail premise needs passing foot traffic and relying on an occasional conference and limited pedestrians passing due to its relative isolation does not suggest they would produce a return.
The offices renovated on the north side of the station have remained vacant for almost two years and further demonstrates this is not the site for such commercial proposals.The Government is proposing to prop up this proposal with $25M to promote economic benefit that simply can't be justified. Local retailers and those who provide accommodation are apparently loathe to comment lest it be seen they are doing so to maintain a direct commercial advantage. Taxpayers' money needs to be spent where the community at large get the most benefit and not for a project that can't be justified.
Gerald Jenzen, Soldiers Hill
HOMELESSNESS NO SIMPLE cause or LABEL
Until we join the dots between housing and homelessness, we will never solve the crisis. Recent coverage of the 'shame' of Melbourne's homelessness focuses attention on the wrong end of the problem. Vilifying people sleeping rough does not help them, splashing the faces of people in crisis in the paper only further stigmatises and isolates them, and fuels public fear and resentment. Yes, it is shameful there are people sleeping on the streets in a country as affluent as Australia. The real shame is that this crisis has been with us for some time, and it is only now that it has become visible in our streets that there is outrage and reaction. Perhaps we are more self-conscious of it with the international spotlight on us this week, but this crisis is not a new one, and the causes of it are not new. Australia is in the grips of an affordable housing crisis that has been building over many years, and we currently don't have a strategy for how we will solve it. We have the right to feel angry about homelessness, but we need to direct our energy towards the successive government policies that have created it, and not towards those sleeping rough. We do not condone aggression and public drug use, and there are avenues through which the police can pursue such behaviour, but it is not illegal to be poor and homeless. We will never solve poverty and homelessness by moving people on, or by putting them in crisis accommodation for a few weeks. Reports of people on the streets declining offers of accommodation ignore the fact that the housing offered is usually a few nights in a rooming house or a refuge. Like you and me, what people who are homeless want is a safe, affordable and, most importantly, permanent place to call home. To provide this we urgently need more public and community housing.
The City of Melbourne is struggling valiantly to balance a humanitarian response with public health and safety, and homelessness services are working hard to engage with chronically disadvantaged people, some of whom have complex needs. Until something is done about the national housing crisis that underpins this problem, we are simply bailing water on a sinking boat. The irony of reading news coverage of property investor borrowing skyrocketing alongside coverage of the homelessness crisis is not lost on us. These two issues are intrinsically linked, and until we join the dots, we'll never solve the crisis. The poor have been squeezed out of the private rental market, and there are tens of thousands of people waiting for public housing. The Victorian Government has committed more than $600 million to social housing and homelessness support largely in response to the Royal Commission into Family Violence. We are still awaiting the Victorian affordable housing strategy. Our Federal Government is a long way from having a plan to tackle this problem. Meanwhile, those on lowest incomes are being pursued by automated Centrelink debt notices, reducing their already meagre incomes. This will inevitably increase homelessness. Let's not think for a moment that by moving people on or placing them in temporary accommodation like rooming houses and motels that the homelessness problem will go away. Poverty and disadvantage behind closed doors is still poverty and disadvantage. We need to stop demonising those without a home. We need to stop trying to come up with quick fixes. As the CEOs of Victoria's leading homelessness, housing and social service organisations, we've been raising this problem for a long time, and it's not going to go away overnight. The way to solve rough sleeping, and other forms of homelessness is by providing enough safe, permanent, affordable housing, and, when needed, the intensive supports to go with it. We're calling on the media and policy makers to maintain their focus on the real shame of the lack of action on housing affordability. We need to get on with making the hard decisions that will solve our community's housing problem. So many people have more than one house and so many more have no home at all.
On behalf of the combined welfare agencies
Undersigned by: Anglicare Victoria, CEO, Paul McDonald, Australian Community Support Organisation, CEO, Karenza Louis-Smith, Berry Street, CEO, Sandie de Wolf AM, Child and Family Services Ballarat, CEO, Allay Joy, cohealth, Chief Executive, Lyn Morgain, Community Housing Federation of Victoria, Executive Officer, Lesley Dredge, Concern Australia, CEO, Michelle Crawford, Council to Homeless Persons, CEO, Jenny Smith, Domestic Violence Victoria, CEO, Fiona McCormack, Good Shepherd Australia New Zealand, CEO, Dimity Fifer, Hume Regional Homelessness Network, Jan Armstrong, Jesuit Social Services, CEO, Julie Edwards, Justice Connect Homeless Law, Manager and Principal Lawyer, Lucy Adams, Ladder, CEO, Elisabeth Tuckey, Latitude: Directions for Young People, Manager, Rhonda Collins, Launch Housing, Acting CEO, Richie Goonan, McCauley Women's Services, CEO, Jocelyn Bignold, Melbourne City Mission, CEO, Vicki Sutton, Merri Outreach Support Service, CEO, Robert Sago, Reclink Australia, CEO, John Ballis, Sacred Heart Mission, CEO, Cathy Humphrey, Safe Futures, CEO, Janine Mahoney, SalvoConnect, The Salvation Army, Network Director, Janet White, South Port Community Housing, CEO, Janet Goodwin, Tenants Union of Victoria, CEO, Mark O'Brien, The Salvation Army Victoria, Major Michael Coleman, State Social Commander, The Salvation Army, General Manager Adult Services, Jane Barnes, Victorian Council of Social Services, CEO, Emma King, VincentCare, CEO, John Blewonski, Wesley Mission Victoria, Chief Operating Officer, Raelene Thompson, Whitelion, CEO, Mark Watt, Wintringham Housing, General Manager, Helen Small, Wombat Housing & Support Services Inc, Executive Officer, Steve Maher, Women's Health West, CEO, Dr Robyn Gregory, Women's Housing Limited, CEO, Judy Line, Youth Projects, Chair, Melanie Raymond.
