News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Questions arise over CSIRO wind farm report 

Questions arise over CSIRO wind farm report

18 Jan, 2012 12:01 AM
A REPORT claiming strong community support for wind farms, including Hepburn, has raised questions about the independence of Australia’s peak scientific body.

The 81-page CSIRO study found negative media reporting of wind farm issues did not correlate with positive community views.

The Courier was not included in the examination of wind farm articles across 19 newspapers against community attitudes.

But the involvement of local green entrepreneur Simon Holmes a Court as well as the CSIRO’s alleged close links to wind developers drew criticism yesterday.

CSIRO deputy director of energy technology Dr Jim Smitham called the study “a snapshot” and similar to research undertaken across all energy sectors.

He said the CSIRO had previously worked with the wind industry but denied bias.

He said the study was not designed to examine alleged health impacts on those living near turbines.

But Moorabool mayor Pat Griffin, Ballarat-based Senator John Madigan and state Member for Western Victoria Simon Ramsay questioned the report’s findings, as did Liberal environment spokesman Greg Hunt.

“I’ve dealt with the CSIRO for over 30 years on a professional basis and find it staggering that it has put out such a biased report,” Cr Griffin said.

Senator Madigan questioned the involvement of Mr Holmes a Court, who is Hepburn Wind chairman.

“Additionally, I’ve only become aware today that the CSIRO has a division that I believe is involved in the siting of wind farms,” Senator Madigan said. “Therefore, is the CSIRO unbiased on this issue?”

Federal Liberal Mr Hunt said he had “enormous respect” for the CSIRO.

“But I do think it is important that in a debate on significant community and environmental issues all voices are heard.”

Green groups such as the Clean Energy Council welcomed the study, saying community support for wind was “much stronger” than reported in the media.

Cam Walker from Friends of the Earth called the report “an excellent piece of research”.

Mr Holmes a Court did not respond to a media inquiry.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
These politicians don't buy the wind spin.
Posted by Genwhy, 18/01/2012 12:16:00 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Obviously the CSIRO is not a believable, i.e credible scientific body if your newpaper report is anything to go by or is the fact that your newspaper wasn't taken into account as part of the study the reason for your interesting bias in this story? I guess the truth for anyone is what we feel most suits our own beliefs. Be interesting to see if you print this comment as it may not suit what is being suggested by this article.
Posted by Bias, 18/01/2012 5:36:05 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
I read this report last night and i couldnt believe my eyes when I saw the bit thanking Mr Holmes a Court and other wind industry figures for their support.

Why did this not include the Waubra wind farm? but included Bald Hills where not a single turbine exists? seems a bit odd to me.

The CSIRO would have been much better off putting their resources towards a proper study on noise and finding out what is driving people out of their homes.

This is a whitewash and nothing but propaganda.

Posted by mick, 18/01/2012 7:17:35 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Community support? where?

Why would anyone support wind farms when all they do is put up our power costs and provide a pathetic amount of totally unreliable electricity.

This report defies logic!

Which communities did the CSIRO survey? fitzroy? brunswick? come on, this is poor coming from a taxpayer funded organisation.

Posted by greeniegarry, 18/01/2012 7:24:47 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Poor old Courier, not being consulted on something as important as windfarms. Maybe they deliberately didn't consult with you because of your own biases.

Even without reading the CSIRO report I would have guessed that there is a lot more support for alternative energy sources than that reported in the media. The vocal minority tend to get far more attention than they are worth.

Posted by poppinj, 18/01/2012 7:32:43 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
This questioning the integrity of science just because you do not like the answer has to stop. Science is subject to constant peer review. I can tell you from experience that it would just not be worth it for the author to fudge results. Their poor judgement would also be detected anddealt with by others at CSIRO.
Posted by Horton, 18/01/2012 8:17:04 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
It shows the desperation of these groups to continue to peddle the lie that man is heating the planet to hell and wind farms are somehow a viable alternative to fossil fuels. It's staggering that a planet which is 4.5 billion years old is supposedly being warmed by man dangerously following 2 decades of warming but the last decade's pause in warming is meaningless despite the rapid increase in co2 emissions. Wind farms are pure tokenism and generate next to no power (that's when the wind is blowing).
Posted by Jeremy, 18/01/2012 8:37:01 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Interesting this "independent" report thanked key windfarm people for their input... Obviously a lot of money in this whole green thing..
Posted by Stevo, 18/01/2012 9:09:43 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
On reading this report there were 4 people interviewed at leonards hill, one was Simon Holmes a court, one was the landhold, one a sharehold and one someone else, a 4 person survey hardly is representative of the communities attitude, especially when they appear to be handpicked to give a certain result.

Make no mistake there is no science in this report, it is selective interviewing that got them this result.

I bet if you went out to Smeaton you would find almost 100% of people apposed to wind turbines and i would expect similar at Waubra.


Posted by nath, 18/01/2012 9:39:59 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
Are you really trying to undermine our confidence in CSIRO? A newspaper like this? I'm so staggered I can't find the right words. Bias and conflict of interest are legitimate issues, but it seems only the politicians are seeing these. If no scientists are echoing the politicians, it's unlikely there is compromising bias present.

It seems really strange to hear talk of bias from a politician, for as we know they are the very source of unbiased fact, never opinion!

Posted by Anne, 18/01/2012 9:53:38 AM, on The Ballarat Courier
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Begonia Festival
 
Ballarat Community Health Nie
 
Her Majesty's NIE
 
Loreto College NIE


The Courier







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...