Big Bash League decision-makers are weighing up whether there is a need to change the mechanism used to resolve tied games in the wake of England's dramatic and controversial World Cup final victory over New Zealand.
In a thrilling finish at Lord's, Eoin Morgan's side claimed the title on a boundary countback after both the regular 50-over match and super over were tied.
It was the first men's international in any format to be decided in such a fashion, prompting calls for administrators to come up with a better way to split finalists in such rare situations.
Cricket Australia officials watched the situation unfold with interest, given that tied BBL games are decided in a similar fashion.
The governing body has left open the prospect of changing the BBL rules to avoid such a scenario, saying it will seek feedback from clubs and broadcasters.
"There's lots of chatter about it," CA's head of Big Bash Leagues Alistair Dobson said.
"It was an amazing game. If we could have a BBL season that could end with a tie and a super over, it'd be a great way to finish.
"It's available to be discussed with the clubs. We haven't locked it in either way.
"At the moment, it's a similar finish to what we saw in the World Cup and we'll work through that over the next period of time."
While there are a wide range of alternatives that could be adopted in place of a boundary countback, simply having further super overs looms as perhaps the most logical.
New Zealand coach Gary Stead suggested sharing the World Cup in the event of a tied final, after his side's agonising defeat.
Former Black Caps allrounder Scott Styris went a step further, describing the International Cricket Council as a "joke".
Australian Associated Press